Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secrets. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2025

A Royal Buckingham Guard

One of the more fascinating aspects of traveling abroad is meeting the people who live there, whether it be enjoying a few moments in a quaint chat or sharing an evening’s intrigue. Sometimes, if Fate permits, we may even be entitled — by means of a glimpse — to gain insight into one or another of life’s great mysteries. On a recent trip to England I had such an experience, and yes, it left a mark. 

It was a typical late September evening, and I found myself with some free time. My business trips to England usually occur once a year, and I relished the chance to explore and meet new people. Strolling the streets near my hotel, I yearned for company. The thought of spending the evening alone held little appeal, so I kept an eye out for a welcoming pub. Fortunately, just around the corner of Devonshire and Greene, I stumbled upon The Bull Dog.

 

Upon entering, I was greeted by a poker-faced elderly gentleman who walked with the most precise, erect carriage. “G’dev’ning, sire.”

 

“Uh, yes, if you wish.”

 

“Might I offer the fine gentleman a seat. Join me. Are you a writer?”

 

“A writer? Beg your pardon. Why, yes. But how did you know?”

 

“I’ve been waiting for a writer. Expecting you. I hope you are THE writer.”

 

“Well, it could be a mistake, I suppose.”

 

He made no further comment, and we sat in silence. He ordered two steins of Guinness and paid for them, offering no explanation for why he sought a writer’s company. Eventually, I ventured a comment on the weather.

 

“Miserable weather,” I said.

 

“Un-hmm.”

 

“Quite a chill wind.”

 

“Uh-hmm.”

 

“Good thing I found somewhere warm.”

 

“Un-hm.”

 

The conversation went nowhere. Finally, he introduced himself. “Jack Moore. And you are?”

 

“Ed Nichols,” I replied, shaking his hand firmly.

 

Moore leaned in, eyes blazing. “I used to be a Royal Buckingham Guard. I am here to tell my story, and you, sir, will write it.”

 

I laughed nervously. “And what story might that be?”

 

He lowered his voice to a near whisper. “England is ruled by the Devil. The Devil rules not openly, but through the discipline of the Guards. And the Guards are trained — not by men, but by flies.”

 * * * 


It took time, patience, and considerable disbelief on my part to absorb Moore’s tale. Each new recruit is taken to a secluded courtyard, often at dawn, where the first lesson begins: observe. Every fly that enters the space is a teacher. Landing, circling, departing — each gesture conveys a message. Guards learn to read patterns imperceptible to ordinary men. Those who falter are quietly removed from duty, their fate whispered about in corridors of marble and shadow.

 

“The flies,” Moore said, “are not mere insects. They are the eyes of the unseen sovereign. The Lord of the Flies — yes, there is such a one — watches, judges, and corrects. Every flap of a wing, every pause upon a fingertip, is part of the examination. Obey, adapt, anticipate — or vanish.”

 

I tried to imagine the training: rows of soldiers, hands poised, faces stoic, each movement measured to the rhythm of wingbeats invisible to all but the initiated. “And you? Did you survive the training?” I asked.

 

Moore’s eyes twinkled. “Survive? I thrived. But only because I learned to listen, not just with my ears, but with my mind, my blood, my very bones.”

 

He paused. The fly that had landed on my glass earlier hovered briefly, then vanished. “Do you understand why I brought you here?”

 

“I… think so,” I said. “To tell the story?”


“Yes. And to warn. Not of England, not of kings, but of attention. Of seeing what is not easily seen. The world bends subtly when those in power are trained by those who are unseen. You, too, must notice, or you will be blinded.”

 

Over the next several days, I began to notice subtle oddities: soldiers standing with a peculiar stiffness, pigeons pausing unnaturally, and the ever-present hum of city life seeming punctuated by invisible watchers. Moore’s words replayed in my mind: “Obey, adapt, anticipate.”

 

One evening, as I walked along the Thames, I glimpsed a guard on duty. He made no movement beyond the minimal turn of the head. Yet something in his eyes suggested he knew of me, though I had never met him. A fly landed on his cuff, paused, then departed. I shivered.


That night, back at the hotel, Moore appeared in my mind’s eye, not physically, but with a clarity more vivid than any apparition. “The story must be written carefully,” he said. “Detail the absurd, the impossible, the mundane that masks the extraordinary. Only then will it serve its purpose. England’s power is not brute; it is subtle. It is in obedience, in discipline, in unseen forces. And the Lord of the Flies is patient. Very patient.”

 

I began to write, first hesitantly, then with growing confidence. Each sentence seemed guided by a will beyond mine. I described the pub, the fly, Moore’s rigid carriage, the invisible hierarchy. Every detail, no matter how minor, carried a resonance.

 

And the more I wrote, the more the world around me seemed to align with the tale. A fly paused on my shoulder. A guard passed silently in the street. I realized: the story and reality were no longer separate. Writing was not merely documentation; it was recognition, participation, obedience, and awakening.

 

When I finished the manuscript, I left it at the pub, under a loose floorboard, where Moore had indicated. He would know where to find it. And as I stepped outside into the London night, a fly landed lightly on my hand, then darted away. I did not try to catch it. I only watched.

 

I understood then: the story was not mine alone. It belonged to those who observe, who notice, who pay attention when the world whispers in wingbeats. England’s power, subtle and strange, had been revealed. And yet, perhaps, only those willing to see — and to write — would ever know it.

 

Walking down an empty street I felt the chill of September, the weight of invisible eyes, and the strange exhilaration of witnessing a secret order older than any throne. 


* * * 

Backstory: I wrote the first two-thirds of this years ago but never knew how to finish it.

I submitted my unifinshed text to Grok with a prompt to complete it. Then I turned to 

editing what Grok produced, which I have now shared here. This is a work of fiction.

Saturday, June 8, 2024

An Overview of Glenn Greenwald's "No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State"

One of my ongoing areas of interest has been the issue of free speech and free thought. I've written numerous times about Bertrand Russell's 1922 lecture on this topic, and frequently warned about the  government's use of propaganda to persuade (manipulate) the masses. It is for this reason I have been interested it the stories of Edward Snowden and Julian Assange. 

This blog post will explore Glenn Greenwald's No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State, a compelling exposé on the expansive surveillance practices of the National Security Agency (NSA) revealed through the whistleblower Edward Snowden. Published in 2014, the book is a detailed account of Snowden's disclosures and the broader implications for privacy, democracy, and government accountability. After the overview I will share what some of Greenwald's critics have said.

* * * * * 

No Place To Hide has five sections. The first details how Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald became involved with bringing Snowden's revelations to light. The meticulous planning and risks involved have the feel of a Mission Impossible flick. It soon becomes apparent why bringing to light these "dark secrets" was such a big deal.

Section two details the scope of NSA surveillance. Americans have generally assumed that there were laws restricting what the NSA, CIA and other agencies have authority to do. Snowden's experience showed him how these agencies have gathered extensive data on American citizens and international targets alike. (They don't call them "spooks" for nothing.)

Greenwald provides examples of various programs, such as PRISM and XKeyscore, which enabled the government to intercept communications and gather metadata. According to Greenwald and Snowden, these agencies were scraping info about us from the biggest social media platforms including Facebook, Google, Yahoo! and Skype. 

One of the first stories the Guardian published was how during the Obama administration the NSA was collecting phone records of millions of Verizon customers. The White House, once this was exposed, defended this mass surveillance of U.S. citizens as necessary for our safety from homeland threats.

Part three lays out the rationale for exposing these government actions, how mass surveillance erodes civil liberties and creates a chilling effect on free speech and dissent. He highlights the constitutional and ethical concerns of pervasive government monitoring, contending that it undermines the principles of a democratic society. (Yes, this is 1984 revisited, in real life.)

Part four goes into detail about media complicity, all the various media players and and other players who willingly participated. Greenwald also discusses the challenges he faced in publishing the Snowden revelations and the broader issues of journalistic integrity and
independence.

The last section is a call to action. Greenwald concludes with an appeal for increased transparency, legal reforms, and public awareness to combat unchecked surveillance. He emphasizes the need for collective action to protect individual privacy and civil liberties.

* * * * *

As you can imagine, not everyone feels the same regardng this book or the actions of whistleblowers like Edwad Snowden. Here are the pros and cons.


POSITIVE REMARKS

Supporters laud Greenwald for his courageous journalism and commitment to transparency. They argue that No Place to Hide sheds light on the extent of government overreach and the importance of protecting democratic freedoms. The book is praised for its meticulous documentation and compelling narrative, which brings crucial issues to the forefront of public discourse.


Many view Greenwald's work as a vital defense of privacy in the digital age. By exposing the NSA's surveillance tactics, the book underscores the need to safeguard personal information from unwarranted government intrusion. Advocates for privacy rights see the book as a critical reminder of the threats posed by mass surveillance.


The book is credited with sparking significant public debate and policy discussions around surveillance and privacy. Snowden's revelations contributed to legal challenges and calls for reform, highlighting their influence on both public opinion and legislative action.


CRITICAL VIEWS

Perhaps the biggest issue has to do with concerns over national security. Critics argue that Greenwald's disclosures, and those of Snowden, compromised national security by revealing classified information. Such leaks endanger intelligence operations and international relations, making it harder for agencies to protect against genuine threats.


Some detractors question Greenwald's objectivity, suggesting that his staunch advocacy for privacy rights and criticism of government overreach may skew his analysis. They argue that his portrayal of the NSA and its activities lacks nuance and fails to adequately consider the complexities of intelligence work.


In light of the above, the book's sympathetic portrayal of Snowden is controversial. While some view Snowden as a hero, others see him as a traitor. Critics argue that Greenwald's narrative may romanticize whistleblowing without fully addressing the potential legal and ethical ramifications.


Bottom Line

It's an enlightening read even if we already knew that our privacy is being violated. The extent to which our personal info is being gleaned is out there in other books like Bob Hoffman's BadMen: How Advertising Went From A Minor Annoyance To A Major Menace. The degree to which our own government has been active in this, however, is disturbing, even scary. If you're unfamiliar with the Snowden story, this is probably a good place to start. 

Monday, October 1, 2018

County Seat Theater Company Presents World Premiere of Denise Hinson's Sweet

September 28 the County Seat Theater Company presented a World Premiere of Denise Hinson's Sweet, directed by Joel Soukkala. I took advantage of an opportunity to attend the third performance Sunday afternoon and was totally impressed by the caliber of the writing as well as the performances of the players in this community theater production.

More than 1200 community theaters were in competition to be selected in the NewPlayFest, a national community theater competition in which more than 280 playwrights submitted scripts. Six theatre troupes were selected, one of these being the Encore Performing Arts Center and this production, Sweet. Dignitaries from around the country were on hand for Friday evening's Premiere, along with playwright Ms. Hinson.

THE SETTING is a rural home, away from the big city, tucked away in a hidden corner of the world, a private space where an old boxer and his wife live, along with a daughter in his mid-thirties and her teenaged son. There's a living room and house interior to the left with an outdoor setting to the right. By means of crickets and birdsongs we know when scenes move from day into night.

"Sweet" is the nickname of Clemmet Carter (Michael Rosea), a former champion boxer who once had a killer left hook. From the start the oxygen tank he relies on makes us aware that he is a weakened man. His wife Addie (Ruthie Breuer), we learn, has become the family's anchor, working as a cleaning lady for wealthy people whom we will learn more about later. Their daughter Ruby and grandson Christopher also live in the home.

THE PLAY opens with darkness on the set, but we hear the sound of breathing and the oxygen tank. As the lights rise so does the old fighter, opening with a soliloquy, reminiscing about his life in the ring. "I dream... I am a god... There is only room for one hero in this ring. I swing... and then... I wake up."

His wife Addie enters the room and shares a dream she just had. "I dreamed last night I had a baby." This is interpreted to mean something good is coming, but also serve to set up a couple humorous lines both sooner and later.

Ruby is introduced next, followed by Christopher, enabling us to get a quick glance at the central characters with a few simple brushstrokes. Equally swift is the screenwriter's skill at engaging the audience. Several lines bring chuckles and light laughter, which affirms a connection was being successfully established early on.

All great stories involve characters. Each character has to have a motivation, a quest. Their personal quest is what drives the story. In Sweet Denise Hinson quickly reveals a few motivations, but takes her time drawing out the other characters drives. For example, early on we learn that Ruby's son Christopher has a passion for illustration. He carries a sketchbook and dreams of being an artist of sorts, an illustrator of graphic novels, something his mom considers impractical in today's world. As the story unfolds we see that Ruby's dream is to escape this isolated home in a remote corner of the world. And the opportunity presents itself when a journalist from Chicago, Trevor Wallace(Greg J. Anderson), arrives with his own personal quest: to write a book about this once great boxer whom he saw fight when he was a boy. Trevor Wallace becomes the catalyst that changes everything for all involved.

As all screenwriters and playwrights know, great films and great plays involve great scenes and great lines. Sweet has both. For example, at one point Clemmet Carter drops a glass. There's a commotion, to which he responds, "I broke a glass, not a hip." It's a hilarious comeback, and the play is full of these little embellishments, light touches that the audience readily responded to.

The journalist succeeds in obtaining access to the old boxer. During their first interview we learn that Clemmet Carter gained the nickname Sweet because of his skill at nailing his opponent's sweet spot with his potent left hook.

The boxer and his wife: Michael "Beatsie" Rosen and Ruthie Breuer. 
One of the creative thematic elements is a massive 3000-piece jigsaw puzzle that the old boxer and his grandson have been working on from the beginning of the play. It's a background motif, symbolism of an incomplete picture of the family and their story, which at root is a story about secrets. At different times various characters help Sweet put a few of the pieces together. At a certain point, when Clemmet inserts the last piece, the audience understands that there will be a greater clarity coming soon in the lives of all these characters. Sweet doesn't realize it, but the audience has been forewarned, an old Hitchcockian trick that Hinson works in seamlessly here.

To say much more would be to give away too much, but as things unravel in the latter part of the play, we increasingly discover there are family secrets which Addie Carter has spent a lifetime burying in order to keep them from coming to light. The journalist, not having realized what he has unearthed, must follow his own passion while the other characters deal with the debris that is their lives.

I can't tell you more without shouting "spoiler alert," so I will wait till someone makes this into a film or you have the opportunity to see it next week. The revelations will whipsaw you like a sidewinder. Hinson's story is masterfully crafted, and the cast was very much up for the occasion.

A "sweet" display in the gallery.
If you've never been, the Encore is a wonderful space and the County Seat Theater Company is a worthwhile contribution to the community. The CSTC has been recognized by the American Association of Community Theater. A big shout out to the cast and director Joel Soukkala, for their superb interpretation of Denise Hinson's rewarding script.

There will be five more performances October 3-7. To purchase tickets, or to learn more about other upcoming shows, visit the County Seat Theater website at www.countyseattheater.com

Another feature of the Encore Theater is an art gallery, curated by artist Kris Nelson, with work by a number of familiar names in the local art scene, including a few pieces by Ms. Nelson. When you go see the play next week (recommended) take time during the intermission to enjoy the art and purchase a raffle ticket to support expansion of the theater. You'll also find wine and sweets.

Related Links
Another story about a boxer, Jack London's A Piece of Steak
Muhammed Ali's Audacity
Local Art Seen: Chairs By Kris

Popular Posts