Sunday, March 15, 2026

The Moral Landscape of Kubrick’s Paths of Glory

Information Conveyed in the First Minutes of Stanley Kubrick's Paths of Glory Before the Battle Begins 

Against a black background we see the United Artists logo in blue with the name in white in a sans serif font. This fades and then the words Bryna Productions present in a serif font appear. The name Kirk Douglas replaces that, with a very large font, followed then by Paths of Glory, with a fine line of print beneath that reads: 
© COPYRIGHT MCMLVII HARRIS-KUBRICK PICTURES CORPORATION.

Co-stars and other featured stars are listed, followed by other staff, art director, screenwriters and the novel it is based on, "Paths of Glory" by Humphrey Cobb.

The opening shot appears at one minute and nineteen seconds into the film. We see what appears to be a scene on the order of Versailles. There are officers on horseback near the foreground, a man on a bicycle to the left, and a few clusters of persons both in the foreground and further away. The scene is black and white, and the words France 1916 are superimposed over it. 

Voiceover: "War began between Germany and France on August 3, 1914." 

The camera follows the bicycle to the foreground which turns to the left. Soldiers bearing arms are marching by as the narrator states that "the German army, five weeks later, had smashed its way to within 18 miles of Paris. There the battered French miraculously rallied their forces at the Marne River, and then a series of unexpected counter attacks drove the Germans back. The front was stabilized, and shortly developed into a continuous line of heavily fortified trenches zigzagging their way 500 miles from the English Channel to the Swiss frontier." 

During this narration soldiers line up in front of this stately French estate which may be the equivalent of our Capitol. A jeep approaches, the men present arms as a person of importance disembarks and strides into the building, accompanied by his aides.

Narrator: "By 1916, after two grisly years of trench warfare, the battle lines had changed very little. Successful attacks were measured in hundreds of yards and paid for in lives numbering hundreds of thousands."

The person of importance is General George Broulard who has come to call on General Paul Mireau. After a little small talk, Gen. Broulard cuts to the chase. "Paul, I've come to see you about something big." 

General Mireau has already heard rumors of what is coming. The Ant Hill has been the key to the whole sector. The Germans have held it for a year and will hold it for another if they want. 

"Paul, I have formal orders to take the Ant Hill no later than the tenth. That's the day after tomorrow," General Boulard says.

"That comes pretty close to being ridiculous, don't you think?" General Mireau replies. 

"I wouldn't be here if I thought that," Gen. Broulard says. He then begins his pitch. "If there's one man who could do this it would be you."

Mireau expresses frankly, "That's out of the question. Absolutely out of the question. My division has been cut to pieces. What's left of it is in no condition to hold the Ant Hill, let alone take it. I'm sorry, but that's the truth."

Gen. Broulard brings out his carrot, dangles a promotion and another star before him, but Mireau remains realistic. It can't be accomplished and he asserts that for him, "My men come first of all, George, and those men know it." And furthermore, "The life of one of those soldiers means more to me than all the stars and decorations and honors in France."

"So, you think this is absolutely beyond the ability of your men at this time," Broulard replies.

General Mireau, tilting his head and making direct eye contact, says, "I didn't say that, George."

And so it begins. The cat and mouse dialogue ends with a decision to make it happen, not for personal glory, but for France. 

* * * 
SPOILER ALERT

* * * 

At six minutes, eight seconds, we cut to the battlefield. Or rather, we see a desolate view of no man's land with the Ant Hill as a backdrop. The camera pulls back and we see that this is a view from an observation window. There's a bomb crater, naked trees stripped of leaves by artillery fire, a dank mist hovering across the blasted terrain.


The camera pulls back to reveal that we are in a concrete bunker, with a soldier standing there viewing the scene through a horizontal notch. He wears a grim expression as he turns away.


Cut to: General Mireau and his chief aide are walking through the trench, Mireau cheerful and with smug purposefulness as he greets the soldiers he passes. The soldiers bolt to attention as he approaches. At intervals he stops to engage in what he imagines to be an inspirational chat. It's not a real dialogue because he is clueless as to the interior condition of these men In point of fact he cares nothing for their welfare, as will become apparent later.


The first two men he stops to talk with will be unjustly placed before a firing squad by the film's end. The third soldier he stops to exchange banter with is clearly shell-shocked. When another soldier standing at this man's side says he's shell-shocked, the general declares that there is no such thing as shell shock. One more signal indicating how removed and out of touch the generals are.


The general, outraged, slugs the shell-shocked soldier in the face, then orders him removed from the regiment. As they continue on their way his aide says, "General, I'm convinced that these tours of your have an incalculable effect on morale. In fact, I think the fighting spirit of the 701st derives from it."


That scene is devastating.

* * * 

Kubrick is doing something subtle in these opening scenes. Before the battle even begins, he is already making a visual argument about war.

The first technique is camera movement. When General Mireau walks through the trench, Kubrick places the camera in front of him and tracks backward as he advances. The shot lasts far longer than most directors would allow. As the general strides forward confidently, soldiers snap to attention one after another, the muddy trench walls pressing in on both sides.


What makes the shot powerful is the contrast it creates. The general moves smoothly through space, confident and purposeful. The soldiers cannot move at all. They are wedged into the trench like parts in a broken machine. The camera forces us to look directly into their faces—tired, anxious, hollow. Mireau sees soldiers. We see human beings.


Kubrick used variations of this technique throughout his career. In The Killing, for example, the camera follows characters through corridors and racetrack passageways in long, deliberate movements that quietly build tension and reveal character. The motion of the camera itself becomes part of the storytelling.


The second technique in Paths of Glory is architectural contrast. The film opens in a grand French chateau where generals discuss strategy beneath high ceilings, polished floors, and ornate walls. War here is calm, civilized, almost elegant. Maps are studied, promotions hinted at, decisions made over polite conversation.


Then Kubrick cuts to the trenches.


The world changes instantly. The ceilings disappear. The sky is gray. The ground is muck. The soldiers live like burrowing animals in narrow corridors carved into the earth. The contrast is unmistakable: the war planned in the palace is fought in the mud.


Kubrick doesn’t have to say what he thinks about war. The camera has already told us. But as anyone knows who has seen this film the dialogue is priceless, especially the manner in which the lines are delivered.


Near the film's conclusion, Kirk Douglas as Colonel Dax delivers this indictment of what was is and does:


"Gentlemen of the court, there are times when I am ashamed to be part of the human race, and this is one of them... I can't believe that the noblest impulse of man, his compassion for another, can be completely dead here."


At this instant my mind goes immediately to the people of Gaza, and the common people of all the other failed states that have been dismantled by imperialist aggression. 


* * * 

Related Link
Poilu -- A Grisly WWI Memoir from the Trenches

Saturday, March 14, 2026

When Progressives Behave Like Luddites

The Luddites and the Curious Meaning of “Progressive”

In the early 1800s, a group of English textile workers began smashing machines. These workers became known as the Luddites, supposedly named after a mythical figure called Ned Ludd. Between 1811 and 1816, bands of workers broke into factories at night and destroyed mechanical looms and knitting frames.

To a certain extent their fear was understandable. The Industrial Revolution was transforming the textile industry, and new machines allowed factory owners to produce cloth faster and cheaper than skilled craftsmen working by hand. Many workers believed the machines would destroy their livelihoods. In protest, they attacked the technology itself.


History, however, remembers the Luddites not as heroes but as a cautionary tale. The machines they tried to stop did not disappear. Instead, industrialization accelerated, creating entirely new industries, jobs, and living standards that were unimaginable at the time. The lesson many historians have drawn is simple: technological progress is disruptive, but trying to stop it rarely works—and often leaves communities worse off.


Which brings us to an irony in today’s political language.


In modern politics, the term “progressive” is commonly used by people who see themselves as champions of social progress and innovation. Yet on issue after issue—artificial intelligence, data centers, energy infrastructure, biotechnology, and even housing development—the loudest opposition often comes from the very groups that use the word progressive to describe themselves.


Meanwhile, conservatives are frequently portrayed as the ones who resist change and cling to the past.


The labels can feel oddly reversed.


If progress means improving productivity, expanding knowledge, and building technologies that make life easier and more prosperous, then resisting those developments begins to look less like progress and more like modern-day Luddism.


The Luddites feared the machines of their era because they could only see what might be lost. What they could not see was the world those machines would eventually help create.


Two centuries later, the same tension remains. Every generation must decide whether it will shape technological change—or try to halt it. History suggests the wiser course is to guide innovation, not fear it.


* * * * *


PostScript: This week a friend shared a video of Bernie Sanders calling for a moratorium on all A.I. development because it is advancing too quickly. But these technologies have been emerging gradually for decades. The practical problem with moratoriums is obvious: once a pause is declared, who decides when it is safe to start again? And in a competitive global economy, would countries such as China agree to stop developing these technologies at the same time?

 

Related Link
See my 2011 blog post,
 Return of the Luddites.


Illustration: Public Domain, creator unknown

Friday, March 13, 2026

Flashback Friday: 14 Blog Posts About The Beatles

Bob Boone, owner of the West Theatre, introducing
The Revolution 5. Thank you, Bob for what you have 
given the City of Duluth by renovating these two theaters.
Thursday evening I had an opportunity to see The Revolution 5, a Beatles tribute band from Minnesota, and, as expected, it was fun, nostalgic and energizing. I'd seen them in 2012 in a smaller venue, and last night the West Theatre was packed as the team of five performed all 27 of The Beatles' number one hits, plus a few additional bonus classics. 

Though outside the City of Duluth was experiencing a smothering blizzard, no one (as far as I could tell) here in the theater could care less. I intended to check to see the road conditions during intermission but forgot that, swept up in the music and memories. Hopefully you all reached home safely.

When we saw the group in 2012 I was impressed. I didn't really prepare in any way. We got tickets and went to an exhilarating show. This time I listened to most of their albums between the time we got tickets two months ago and the show last night. Besides being famously talents songwriters, they really were innovative musicians. 

Rather than write a review of last night's show I thought I'd pull together some of the blog posts I've written about the Beatles over the years. To catch a review of the show I recommend that you pick up next week's Duluth Reader and look for the story by Jill "Jillybones" Fisher who covers the local music scene here. You can also find her columns online here.

In the meantime, enjoy these stories about The Beatles

Tim Hatfield's Beatles Tribute Now In Print: When We Find Ourselves in Times of Trouble 

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/9146215066182995239/7605976059959242264


The 10 Most Expensive Vinyl Records Ever Sold

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-10-most-expensive-vinyl-records.html


John Lennon Slits a Vein and Unburdens His Soul In "Yer Blues"

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2018/05/john-lennon-slits-vein-and-unburdens.html


Tomorrow Never Knows: The Beatles' Turning Point?

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2018/04/tomorrow-never-knows-beatles-turning.html


Dutch Beatles Authority Chantal de Paus Addresses Beatles Conspiracy Theories and How the Fab Four Became So Popular 

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/9146215066182995239/2418279277774081471


50 Years Ago Today: The Beatles' Revolver Fires Imaginations

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2016/08/50-years-ago-today-beatles-revolver.html


Back In The U.S.S.R. -- Beatles Just Having Fun Causes a Stir

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2016/07/back-in-ussr-beatles-just-having-fun.html


A Beatles Timeline, Three Beatles Trivia Quizzes and More

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-beatles-timeline-three-beatles-trivia.html


The Revolution 5: All Beatles, All Night Long

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2012/01/revolution-5-all-beatles-all-night-long.html


Helter Skelter, Revisited

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2009/10/helter-skelter.html


Nevada Bob MeetsThe Beatles and 14,000 Screaming Beatles Fans

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2021/12/nevada-bob-meetsthe-beatles-and-14000.html


Was Ringo a Starr? Oh Yeah.

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2016/06/was-ringo-starr-oh-yeah.html

 

George Harrison and the Concert for Bangladesh

https://ennyman.medium.com/george-harrison-and-the-concert-for-bangladesh-8802fd91464b?sk=21e0a740613a8d8c3475b0fcec06c067


A Leadership Lesson from John Lennon

https://audacityhr.com/a-leadership-lesson-from-john-lennon/


Personally, I think their most remarkable achievement was the moment they occupied the top five positions on the Billboard Hot 100 simultaneously. It was an extraordinary display of cultural influence and popularity, showing not just one hit song but complete dominance of the charts—a rare feat that few artists in music history have ever matched. What do you think?

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

When AI Takes the Stage: Tilly Norwood’s Musical Debut

Last year actress Tilly Norwood came out of nowhere to become a sensational new media darling. Well, that depends on who you ask. There were quite a few who really didn't know what to think. 

This year, as Hollywood prepares for another Oscar weekend celebrating the world’s best actors, Tilly Norwood is back. Described as the world’s first AI actor, Tilly has just released a playful new music video titled “Take the Lead.” It's a blend of pop and comedy with what Tilly's creators believe is an imortant message: artificial intelligence doesn’t have to threaten creativity—it can expand it.

Rather than tell you about her new video, let's watch it.

Evidently Tilly Norwood's acting debut will take place later this year, so what better time to release this video when Hollywood vibes are wafting in the air.

Her creators calling what's coming the “Tillyverse,” a cloud-based entertainment world where AI characters can interact, perform and collaborate with human creators. 


At the center of the project is Eline van der Velden, an actor and entrepreneur who founded the production company Particle6 and the AI talent studio Xicoia. (Do they have auditions and screen tests?) Van der Velden both created the character and physically performed the role through performance-capture technology, effectively acting as Tilly’s on-screen presence.

 

The song itself addresses the growing conversation about AI in the entertainment industry. Rather than portraying technology as a replacement for actors, the lyrics suggest it could become a new creative tool. I thought the comic flourishes were hilarious. The tomatoes splatting on the car window, the "accidents"... and no need for stunt doubles. She even jokes about never having to stop to breathe while singing demanding musical numbers. (Would an AI Pavarotti get 167 encores? I doubt it, but I have been wrong before, and the future is not here yet.)


Behind the scenes, the production blends emerging AI tools with traditional filmmaking craft. I mean, isn't this just a "next iteration" of Gollum from Lord of the Rings? The music was generated using Suno, while the video was produced by Particle6 using a range of AI techniques and a team of 18 human creatives—including a director, designers, writers and editors.


Van der Velden says the project is meant to explore how human imagination and new technology can work together. The goal, she emphasizes, isn’t replacing artists but experimenting with new ways to tell stories in an evolving digital medium.


So what did you think of the video? I found it strange how viscerally spiteful many  of the comments on YouTube were. Here's a sampling:


—AI will separate those who have taste from those who come on the Internet to follow trending topics to pretend that they have taste if anyone actually thinks this is good quality. It’s because they lack any artistic merit.


—One thing is clear- that the humans behind this have no taste


—YouTube really needs to start a filter for AI crap


—Gross.  This fad needs to go.  Disgustingly uncreative and lifeless slop.  Only bots are giving this crap thumbs up.


—This is irresponsible. Art is a human expression, not an impression of humanity. Let AI impress upon tedium so humans can more freely express, not the reverse.


—i am throwing an immense surplus of tomatoes. this is terrible


—Cringy


I shared these because I thought they were a combination of silly, comic and absurd. Come on people, lighten up. 


Bonus Track: Check out AI Ed as 007.

Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Life in an Era of Pied Pipers Wielding Weapons of Mass Manipulation

I still remember when I first heard the story of the Pied Piper as a child. It must have been something on TV because I have images in my memory closet associated with the story. In junior high school, a few years later, Crispian St. Peter's recording of "The Pied Piper" reached the top ten as a 45 single (which I recorded on my Estey two-speed reel-to-reel from the radio, and still own.)

As I'm often fond of saying, we live in an era of spin. Nearly every major event has spinners striving to control the way viewers, listeners and readers perceive these events. But it doesn't stop there. Political opponents are also busy trying to recast past events as well. As George Orwell famously stated in his opus, "Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past."

While looking through one of my notebooks I came across this parallel notion. "We live in an era of Pied Pipers wielding weapons of mass manipulation."

For those unfamiliar, the old folktale tells of a mysterious figure who had been sought out to help rid the city of rats. He arrives not with rat traps but with a magic flute. When he plays his magic tune, the mayor, city council and half the city leaders follow him off into the mountains.


No, just kidding. He plays his flute and all the rodents follow in a parade to a place far away.  


When he returns to receive his agreed upon compensation, they choose instead to stiff him. Well, he's got another trick up his sleeve. He pulls out that flute again, and plays a different tune, this time charming the minds of all the children of that town who proceed to follow him off into the mountains, never to return.


Today the flute has been replaced by algorithms, screens, and carefully engineered narratives, but the principle is much the same. The modern Piper doesn't need a stage in the town square; he operates through phones in our pockets, feeds on our screens, and voices in our earbuds.

The tools of persuasion have never been more powerful. Social media platforms can amplify a message to millions within minutes. Data analytics allow organizations to tailor messages to specific fears, desires, and identities. Images, slogans, and emotional appeals are designed not merely to inform but to provoke reaction. The result is an environment where attention is captured, outrage is cultivated, and loyalty is shaped with remarkable precision.


The danger is not simply misinformation. It is the erosion of independent judgment. When people are continually immersed in streams of emotionally charged content, it becomes difficult to step back and evaluate claims carefully. The Pipers' melodies are constant, and it is often easier to follow than to question.


One difference between the fable and now is that there are multiple pipers, though what you respond to will increasingly result in more affirmation of the perspective you're leaning into.


History reminds us that charismatic voices have always had the ability to sway crowds. What is different today is scale and speed. A manipulative message can circle the globe before reason has time to catch up. Political movements, commercial interests, and ideological campaigns all compete to command the tune, and our loyalty. This is where the real battleground it.


The antidote is not silence but discernment. Citizens must cultivate habits of skepticism, patience, and humility in the face of persuasive appeals. The responsibility ultimately rests with individuals who choose whether to follow the music or pause long enough to ask where these Piper intend to lead us.


Photo of Paquita, a girl from the orphanage in Mexico where we once served. 

Popular Posts