Showing posts with label Bananas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bananas. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

The Banana Stand: How a Piece of Fruit Became a Symbol for Nuclear Advocacy

At first glance, a banana stand might not seem like a tool for climate action. But for Generation Atomic, a grassroots organization advocating for nuclear energy, the humble banana has become a powerful — and even radioactive — symbol.

The idea originated at the 2017 Climate Talks, where Eric Meyer, founder of Generation Atomic, attended a pro-nuclear, pro-environment event but was not allowed to actively participate. Out of that frustration came a creative workaround: use a banana to tell the story that couldn’t be told. The message was simple yet profound: “A banana is radioactive. Nuclear is carbon-free.”


Bananas contain potassium — and all potassium is naturally radioactive. It’s a safe, everyday reminder that radiation is a part shut down. Their volunteers use a standard script designed for intentional advof life. Generation Atomic began handing out bananas at major environmental events to start conversations that might otherwise beocacy, gently reframing nuclear skepticism into curiosity.


It starts with a question:
“Do you know why we’re giving out bananas?”
“What mineral is in bananas?” (Answer: Potassium.)
“Did you know that all potassium is naturally radioactive?”
And finally: “You don’t need a license to eat bananas.”


This playful approach introduces the Banana Equivalent Dose (BED) — a unit scientists use to explain radiation exposure in familiar terms. Living near a nuclear power plant over the core of a year, for instance, exposes you to about the same radiation as eating a few bananas.


The banana stand has since become an icon at climate gatherings, featured in the documentary Atomic Hope. It’s more than a stunt — it’s a strategy. In a world divided over nuclear power’s role in the green transition, Generation Atomic’s message cuts through with wit and warmth: sometimes, the path to understanding starts with something as simple as a piece of fruit.

Related Links
Why Generation Atomic Isn't Marching
Five Minutes with Joe Heffernan on Nuclear Energy
Joe Miller Discusses the Power Grid: Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?Introducing Your Friendly Neighborhood Nuclear Energy Facility

Sunday, August 14, 2022

Six Articles about the CIA's Overthrow of a Democratically Elected President in Guatemala 1954

The 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état, code-named Operation PBSuccess, was a covert operation by the CIA that deposed the democratically elected Guatemalan President Jacobo Arbenz.  

A Chiquita PR Campaign was Powerful Enough to Topple the Guatemalan Government
Chiquita’s brand image comes across as fun and playful, but the company has some dark history. 

The (Literally) Unbelievable Story of the Original Fake News Network
Once upon a time in Guatemala, the CIA hired a cocky American actor and two radio DJs to launch a revolution and oust a president. Their playbook is being used against the U.S. right now.
[EdNote: This is a Wag the Dog story. Reality is stranger than fiction.*
]

Blood For Bananas: United Fruit's Central American Empire
A politician named Jacobo Arbenz was elected president in Guatemala, one of the Central American countries occupied by United Fruit. Arbenz was a strict nationalist, and all he wanted was for his people to stop suffering in poverty. One of the most prominent issues in Guatemala, at the time, was scarcity of land. When United Fruit invaded Guatemala, they bought out many of the local farmers to acquire land for their plantations. This did not leave room for the peasants, who relied on farming as the sole source of their income. 

1954 Coup: Destroying Democracy
In 1954, the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government of Guatemala, violently reversing the progressive policies of the civilian governments. This coup was undertaken at the behest of the United Fruit Company, and it ushered in a thirty-six-year civil war that claimed the lives of approximately 200,000 civilians.


Propaganda Revisited 
In 1928 Edward Bernays, in a book titled Propaganda, argued that propaganda was a good thing, a useful tool for the ruling elite because the masses needed to be moved. They were sheep too dumb to know what was best for them without guidance. The government and the media should work together to create an appetite for the right goods, services, leaders.  

CIA and Assassinations: The Guatemala 1954 Documents
In 1997 the CIA de-classified 1400 of the 100,000 documents related to the Guatemala destabilization program.
* * * * *
The proper way to do a mashup like this is to add value through interpreting what it means or making comments regarding these things. What is unfortunate is that the more one learns about our clandestine activities, especially the abuse of power demonstrated in this chronicle of manipulation and subversion, the more challenging it is to trust our nation's leadership. Sadly, Guatemala was not an isolated event.


*This is why a wise man once said "Believe nothing of what you hear and only half of what you see."

Thursday, June 9, 2022

Is Our Insanely Picky Government Overreach Driving Us Bananas?

THROWBACK THURSDAY
This story was originally published in June 2009

Woody Allen's films have always been distinctive. His early films reveal a clever eccentric whose unexpected juxtapositions make it impossible not to laugh. In his 1971 film Bananas, the early scene with Howard Cosell announcing a presidential assassination in a Latin American banana republic, as if it were an Ali fight, is so over the top... it works. I'm smiling as I write this because it's still hilarious as I replay it in my mind. 

There are, of course, many memorable scenes in that film with favorites that include the courtroom spoofs and the guerrillas in training. 

In this blog note wanted to draw attention to an unforgettable scene late in the film where the revolutionaries have overthrown the arbitrary rule of the dictators. All the citizens have been lined up to hear the new rules announced. One of these new rules is the requirement that everyone must regularly change their underwear. "To enforce this rule everyone will be required to wear their underwear on the outside." 
 
"Just checking to make sure you have your underwear on."
So it was with great amusement that I read an Associated Press story last night about a new law passed in Brooksville, Fla.... Workers Must Wear Underwear. Evidently when this story crossed the wire it turned many others' heads as well because a quick Google search shows more than 300 newspaper editors have picked up the account.
 
I sort of understand dress codes in the work place. But this story underscores the problems that ensue when legislators attempt to turn common sense into laws, regulations or codes. In this instance, city workers are required to use deodorant. How, might we ask, will this be enforced? If you are digging ditches and it's ninety degrees in the shade with 100% humidity, is there a sweat-meter that will measure if your underarms are sufficiently schlocked with Right Guard. I can see a great PR campaign here... "Right Guard keeps city employees out of jail with a free Xtreme Clear Power Gel Arctic Refresh."
 
But that underwear clause is what has me confused. Who will be the enforcer? Will all men have to keep their flies open so we can see that they are properly suited for work? Apparently Bananas was more relevant than we realized.

* * *
 
Kudos to Reason magazine for their Brickbats awards highlighting government actions that are excessively stupid, as well as all the other stories about government overreach.

Examples of other stupid laws abound. You can Google "Stupid Laws" and find a wealth of material. In Missouri it is illegal to drive with an uncaged bear in your car. In North Dakota it is illegal to serve beer and pretzels at the same time. (Probably has something to do with the animosity toward Germans in WWI.)  In NYC kids can't have a lemonade stand without a permit and it takes 4 to 6 months to get one. So much for teaching children the basics of entrepreneurship.

For the fun of it, here is a 12-page list of silly laws still on the books in our various states. 


Friday, June 19, 2009

Bananas

Woody Allen's films have always been distinctive. His early films reveal a clever eccentric whose unexpected juxtapositions make it impossible not to laugh. In his 1971 film Bananas, the early scene with Howard Cosell announcing a presidential assassination in a Latin American banana republic, as if it were an Ali fight, is so over the top... it works. I'm smiling as I write this because it's still hilarious as I replay it in my mind.

There are, of course, many memorable scenes with favorites including the courtroom spoofs and the guerillas in training. But this blog note wants to draw attention to an unforgettable scene late in the film where the revolutionaries have overthrown the arbitrary rule of the dictators and now have all the peoples lined up to announce the new rules. One of these new rules is the requirement that everyone must regularly change their underwear. "To enforce this rule everyone will be required to wear their underwear on the outside."

So it was with great amusement that I read an Associated Press story last night about a new law passed in Brooksville, Fla.... Workers Must Wear Underwear. Evidently when this story crossed the wire it turned many others' heads as well because a quick Google search shows more than 300 newspaper editors have picked up the account.

I understand dress codes in the work place. But this story underscores the problems that ensue when legislators attempt to turn common sense into laws, regulations or codes. In this instance, city workers are required to use deoderant. How, might we ask, will this be enforced? If you are digging ditches and it's ninety degrees in the shade with 100% humidity, is there a sweat-meter that will measure if you are sufficently schlocked with Right Guard. I can see a great PR campaign here... "Right Guard keeps city employees out of jail with a free Xtreme Clear Power Gel Arctic Refresh."

But that underwear clause is what has me confused. Who will be the enforcer? Will all men have to keep their flies open so we can see that they are properly suited for work?

Apparently Bananas was more relevant than we realized.

Popular Posts