Showing posts with label Hersh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hersh. Show all posts

Saturday, June 6, 2026

Efficiency Gets You Nowhere Fast: Why Effectiveness Is Marketing’s Real Edge

"I lived on books. Books taught me how to think."--Seymour Hersh 

Marketing Matters, Business North
Published June 2026

When I first began working in a corporate environment one of the books I read was Peter Drucker’s The Effective Executive. It was so packed with gems that for several years I read it at least once a year. 

 

The first chapter is “Effectiveness Can Be Learned” and the opening sentence pierces like an arrow: “To be effective is the job of the executive.” But right away Drucker underscores this by letting his readers know that there’s a big difference between effectiveness and efficiency. “The executive is, first of all, expected to get the right things done.” 

 

This distinction seems simple at first glance but it becomes more profound the longer you think about it. Efficiency, he said, is doing things right. Effectiveness is doing the right things. In marketing, it’s easy to confuse the two.

 

Many of us admire speed, productivity, automation, optimization, and multitasking. We celebrate go-getters who answer emails quickly, process orders rapidly, and fill every square on their calendars with activity. Entire industries have emerged to help us become more efficient. Software dashboards track our productivity. AI tools now promise to save hours. Consultants teach workflows, systems, and hacks.

 

None of this is inherently bad. Efficiency has value. But efficiency applied to the wrong objective simply gets you to the wrong destination faster. 

 

And that’s Drucker’s point. A company can become incredibly efficient at producing products no one wants. A sales team can efficiently pursue low-quality leads. A marketing department can perfectly execute campaigns directed to the wrong audience. A manager can spend an entire day clearing emails and attending meetings without advancing the organization’s mission a single inch. (I can tell you stories about meetings.)

 

In other words, efficiency asks: “How well are we doing this?” Effectiveness asks: “Should we even be doing this at all?” 

 

I'm guessing the marketplace is littered with businesses that were highly efficient right before they disappeared.

 

The railroad industry is a classic example. Many railroads believed they were in the railroad business when in reality they were in the transportation business. They became very good at operating railroads while airplanes, trucking, and automobiles redefined how people and goods moved across the country. They optimized the old model while the world changed around them. What works in Italy or Japan doesn't necessarily make sense here. Yet AMTRACK continues to burn (taxpayer) money while advocates push for new trains in California and here in Minnesota. Bite the bullet. Why this waste?

 

The same thing happens on a smaller scale every day. It’s probably not uncommon for business owners to obsess over reducing printing costs for their brochures without ever stopping to ask whether the brochure itself has any value. This is where marketing often goes sideways.

 

Many marketing conversations today revolve around metrics that look impressive but may not matter. I've written about this before. Clicks, impressions, views, followers, open rates, engagement percentages--these can all be useful indicators worth paying attention to, but they are not the ultimate question.

 

The ultimate question is simpler: Is this helping us achieve our real objective? If the goal is sales growth, are sales increasing? If the goal is customer loyalty, are customers returning? If the goal is brand awareness, are more qualified prospects entering the pipeline? If the goal is trust, are people recommending us to others? It's easy to become mesmerized by measurable activity while losing sight of meaningful outcomes.

 

This is why effectiveness requires clarity. You can't do the right things if you don't clearly define what “right” means.

 

I used to have a handwritten note taped on my wall where I could see it every day that said, "Nothing Unnecessary." I enjoyed multitasking and super-productivity. Then, early in my career, I got a review in which my boss pointed out that I was on a team. Relationships matter, too.  "Stop and smell the roses," he said. He respected my output but reminded me that efficiency can be a trap. 

 

In other words, as in much of life we need to find the Golden Mean.

 

Drucker famously said, "There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all." That statement should probably be taped to every office wall.

 

This takes discipline because effectiveness often requires saying no. No to distractions.
No to shiny new toys. No to strategies that are fashionable but misaligned with your mission.
No to activities that consume time but produce little value. 

 

In marketing especially, the temptation is to chase every new platform, every trend, every tactic, every algorithm change. 

 

But effective marketing begins with understanding your customer, understanding your message, and understanding your purpose. Only then does efficiency become meaningful. Otherwise, we risk becoming very busy while accomplishing very little.

 

The challenge for leaders today is not merely improving execution. It is developing the wisdom to distinguish between activity and progress. Because the marketplace ultimately does not reward businesses that are merely active. It rewards businesses that are effective.

Friday, September 5, 2025

What We Knew and Didn't Know During the Iranian Hostage Crisis

On February 11, 1979, Ayatollah Khomeini and his supporters overthrew the Shah of Iran, marking the end of the monarchy. But when we reflect back on this disruptive event, how many of us recall that the hostage crisis didn't begin until nearly nine months later, November 4, 1979.

Initially 66 Americans were taken hostage when the U.S. embassy was stormed, but shortly after 13 were released and then another for health reasons so that a total of 52 we held captive for the 444 day ordeal.

There were actually many Americans in Iran at the time of this crisis. Many were missionaries, including a friend with whom I painted apartments in Minneapolis a couple years after. Dennis and his family sold their house in exchange for two Persian rugs and a gold belt, hurriedly leaving the country by escaping into Turkey.

Not once did I ever hear the story of how the Shah came into power 26 years earlier. Why were Americans so ignorant about this backstory? 

* * *

It was David Halberstam's The Fifties that opened my eyes regarding the extent of U.S. meddling in foreign affairs. Though I, like many, were aware of our country's bad behavior in places like Chile, Central America and Vietnam, Halberstam gets beneath the surface to where the seeds were first planted. Iran was among the first in a series of clandestine interventions in which leaders were overthrown so that we could install our own puppets.

Here's a short list of countries we messed with in the 1950s and 60s: Egypt, Iran, Guatemala, Indonesia, Lebanon, Iraq, Cuba, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Laos, Dominican Republic, South Vietnam, Brazil, and Indonesia, among others. According to one source, the U.S. made 66 regime change attempts during the Cold War, succeeding in 26 of these. 75% of our successes were by means of election interference. 

* * * 

I mention all of the above in order to point out that the media failed us by not informing us of the backstory regarding how the Shah of Iran gained power in the first place. The CIA, in collaboration with British intelligence (Operation Ajax), orchestrated the overthrow of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh after he nationalized Iran’s oil industry. 

This preface from Stephen Kinzer's All the Shah's Men shows how our CIA-funded & generated 1953 coup affected the people themselves. Were they happier afterwards?

One day I attended a book party for an older Iranian woman who had written her memoirs. She spoke for an hour about her eventful life. Although she never touched on politics, she mentioned in passing that her family was related to the family of Mohammad Mossadegh, who served as prime minister of Iran for twenty-six months in the early 1950s and was overthrown in a coup d'etat staged by the Central Intelligence Agency.

After she finished speaking, I couldn't resist the temptation to ask a question. "You mentioned Mossadegh," I said. "What do you remember, or what can you tell us, about the coup against him?" She immediately became agitated and animated.

"Why did you Americans do that terrible thing?" she cried out. "We always loved America. To us, America was the great country, the perfect country, the country that helped us while other coun- tries were exploiting us. But after that moment, no one in Iran ever trusted the United States again. I can tell you for sure that if you had not done that thing, you would never have had that problem of hostages being taken in your embassy in Tehran. All your trouble started in 1953. Why, why did you do it?"

This outburst reflected a great gap in knowledge and understanding.

* * *
This week, American journalist Seymour Hersh wrote about the Biden administration's blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines in the Baltic Sea. The media repeated bogus claims from Washington like, "We have no idea who would do such a thing" and "Maybe the Russians did it." Reading the Hersh piece brought to mind the above memories regarding the Shah's downfall. 

As my mother frequently said, "Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive." 

Popular Posts