Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leadership. Show all posts

Saturday, June 6, 2026

Efficiency Gets You Nowhere Fast: Why Effectiveness Is Marketing’s Real Edge

"I lived on books. Books taught me how to think."--Seymour Hersh 

Marketing Matters, Business North
Published June 2026

When I first began working in a corporate environment one of the books I read was Peter Drucker’s The Effective Executive. It was so packed with gems that for several years I read it at least once a year. 

 

The first chapter is “Effectiveness Can Be Learned” and the opening sentence pierces like an arrow: “To be effective is the job of the executive.” But right away Drucker underscores this by letting his readers know that there’s a big difference between effectiveness and efficiency. “The executive is, first of all, expected to get the right things done.” 

 

This distinction seems simple at first glance but it becomes more profound the longer you think about it. Efficiency, he said, is doing things right. Effectiveness is doing the right things. In marketing, it’s easy to confuse the two.

 

Many of us admire speed, productivity, automation, optimization, and multitasking. We celebrate go-getters who answer emails quickly, process orders rapidly, and fill every square on their calendars with activity. Entire industries have emerged to help us become more efficient. Software dashboards track our productivity. AI tools now promise to save hours. Consultants teach workflows, systems, and hacks.

 

None of this is inherently bad. Efficiency has value. But efficiency applied to the wrong objective simply gets you to the wrong destination faster. 

 

And that’s Drucker’s point. A company can become incredibly efficient at producing products no one wants. A sales team can efficiently pursue low-quality leads. A marketing department can perfectly execute campaigns directed to the wrong audience. A manager can spend an entire day clearing emails and attending meetings without advancing the organization’s mission a single inch. (I can tell you stories about meetings.)

 

In other words, efficiency asks: “How well are we doing this?” Effectiveness asks: “Should we even be doing this at all?” 

 

I'm guessing the marketplace is littered with businesses that were highly efficient right before they disappeared.

 

The railroad industry is a classic example. Many railroads believed they were in the railroad business when in reality they were in the transportation business. They became very good at operating railroads while airplanes, trucking, and automobiles redefined how people and goods moved across the country. They optimized the old model while the world changed around them. What works in Italy or Japan doesn't necessarily make sense here. Yet AMTRACK continues to burn (taxpayer) money while advocates push for new trains in California and here in Minnesota. Bite the bullet. Why this waste?

 

The same thing happens on a smaller scale every day. It’s probably not uncommon for business owners to obsess over reducing printing costs for their brochures without ever stopping to ask whether the brochure itself has any value. This is where marketing often goes sideways.

 

Many marketing conversations today revolve around metrics that look impressive but may not matter. I've written about this before. Clicks, impressions, views, followers, open rates, engagement percentages--these can all be useful indicators worth paying attention to, but they are not the ultimate question.

 

The ultimate question is simpler: Is this helping us achieve our real objective? If the goal is sales growth, are sales increasing? If the goal is customer loyalty, are customers returning? If the goal is brand awareness, are more qualified prospects entering the pipeline? If the goal is trust, are people recommending us to others? It's easy to become mesmerized by measurable activity while losing sight of meaningful outcomes.

 

This is why effectiveness requires clarity. You can't do the right things if you don't clearly define what “right” means.

 

I used to have a handwritten note taped on my wall where I could see it every day that said, "Nothing Unnecessary." I enjoyed multitasking and super-productivity. Then, early in my career, I got a review in which my boss pointed out that I was on a team. Relationships matter, too.  "Stop and smell the roses," he said. He respected my output but reminded me that efficiency can be a trap. 

 

In other words, as in much of life we need to find the Golden Mean.

 

Drucker famously said, "There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all." That statement should probably be taped to every office wall.

 

This takes discipline because effectiveness often requires saying no. No to distractions.
No to shiny new toys. No to strategies that are fashionable but misaligned with your mission.
No to activities that consume time but produce little value. 

 

In marketing especially, the temptation is to chase every new platform, every trend, every tactic, every algorithm change. 

 

But effective marketing begins with understanding your customer, understanding your message, and understanding your purpose. Only then does efficiency become meaningful. Otherwise, we risk becoming very busy while accomplishing very little.

 

The challenge for leaders today is not merely improving execution. It is developing the wisdom to distinguish between activity and progress. Because the marketplace ultimately does not reward businesses that are merely active. It rewards businesses that are effective.

Monday, May 11, 2026

Lessons for Leaders from Napoleon and the Battle of Austerlitz

My interest in Napoleon Bonaparte was triggered by an observation made in the introduction to Grant Wins the WarJames R. Arnold's account of how General U.S. Grant captured the City of Vicksburg, cutting off supplies from the West and sealing the doom of the rebel South in our American Civil War. The author stated, "Of the twenty most brilliant campaigns in military history, more than half were by Napoleon. Only two were conceived and executed by generals in the U.S. Civil War. The first was General Stonewall Jackson’s Shenandoah Campaign. The second, Grant’s victory at Vicksburg."

That simple statement made me seriously interested in learning more about this man. One of the first things I learned was that there were more books written about Napoleon than any other person in the 19th century. After a little research I purchased Chandler's 1200-page The Campaigns of Napoleon, the first hundred pages serving as an outstanding overview of his life, career, philosophy, achievements and more.

* * * 

The Battle of Austerlitz—often called “The Battle of the Three Emperors”—was Napoleon’s greatest battlefield triumph. Fought near the town of Austerlitz in what is now the Czech Republic, it pitted Napoleon Bonaparte against the combined armies of Austria and Russia, led by Emperor Francis II and Tsar Alexander I.


Napoleon’s Objective

Napoleon’s central objective was not merely to defeat the Allied army, but to destroy it decisively enough to break the coalition against France and secure French dominance in Europe. He understood that France could not survive endless coalitions forming against her. He needed a victory so overwhelming that it would psychologically and politically shatter his enemies. 


And that is precisely what happened. After Austerlitz, the Austrian Empire sued for peace, and the old Holy Roman Empire effectively collapsed soon afterward.


Napoleon’s Strategy

Understanding the map is not important 
to getting the point.
Napoleon’s brilliance at Austerlitz lay in deception. He intentionally appeared weak. He thinned his right flank and even abandoned the strategically important Pratzen Heights—high ground in the center of the battlefield. To the Allies, this looked like hesitation or vulnerability. They believed Napoleon was retreating and vulnerable to encirclement.


But this appearance of weakness was bait. Napoleon predicted the Allies would overcommit against his deliberately weakened right side. Once they did, their own center on the Pratzen Heights became dangerously exposed. That was the trap.


At the decisive moment, Napoleon launched Marshal Soult’s corps directly into the weakened center, splitting the Allied army in two. Fog lifted as the French attacked, and the sudden appearance of disciplined French columns emerging into sunlight became legendary, later romanticized as “the Sun of Austerlitz.”


As I read this battle description, I was reminded of Napoleon's 1805 naval defeat at the hands of Britain's Admiral Horatio Nelson, whose bust Napoleon had on his desk out of respect for this master strategist. The Battle of Trafalgar took place only two months earlier so it must have been fresh in Napoleon's mind. You can read here the strategy Lord Nelson used to rout his opponents in Trafalgar, dissecting the combined French and Spanish navies to create mass confusion.


Once the center collapsed, the Allied flanks became isolated and disorganized. Thousands drowned retreating across frozen lakes and marshes, though later accounts may exaggerate the scale of this catastrophe.


Napoleon had achieved what military theorists call the destruction of enemy cohesion.


Famous Quotes Associated with Austerlitz

Napoleon was extraordinarily conscious of morale, symbolism, and memory. Before the battle, he reportedly told his troops: “Soldiers, I shall end this campaign with a thunderbolt.”


And after the victory: “One sharp blow and the war is over.”


Another famous line associated with his philosophy of war: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” 


That sentence almost perfectly summarizes Austerlitz. He allowed the Allies to execute the very maneuver he wanted them to attempt.


Another relevant Napoleon quote: “The moral is to the physical as three is to one.”


Napoleon understood that wars are fought not only with weapons and numbers, but with confidence, fear, perception, momentum, and belief.


Lessons for Today

Austerlitz still fascinates military strategists, business leaders, and political thinkers because its lessons extend far beyond warfare.

1. The Power of Controlled Weakness

Napoleon demonstrated that appearing weak can lure opponents into overconfidence. (Is this currently what has been happening in Iran?) Strategic patience and misdirection can be more effective than raw force. Modern parallels appear in diplomacy, politics, media, and business competition.


2. Concentration at the Decisive Point

Napoleon did not try to be strong everywhere. He identified the decisive moment and concentrated force precisely there. This principle still governs successful strategy today: Focus resources, identify leverage points and avoid dispersion.


3. Information and Perception Matter

Napoleon manipulated what the Allies believed about him. In many ways, Austerlitz was an information war before it became a shooting war. Modern conflicts—political and military alike—are often battles over narrative, confidence, morale, and interpretation. 


4. Overconfidence Destroys Judgment

The Allies believed Napoleon was retreating because they wanted to believe it. Their assumptions blinded them. Austerlitz remains a warning about confirmation bias: leaders often see what flatters their expectations.


5. Leadership Under Pressure

Napoleon projected confidence even when circumstances were risky. His calmness transmitted itself to the army.


Whether in war, politics, or business, morale frequently flows downward from leadership.


The enduring fascination of Austerlitz is that it was not merely a victory of force, but a victory of psychology, timing, deception, and clarity of vision. Napoleon made his enemies participate in their own defeat.


Related Trivia

Ludwig van Beethoven's Symphony No. 3 in E-flat major, Op. 55, known as the Eroica ("Heroic"), is a monumental 1804 work that redefined symphonic form, marking the transition from Classical to Romantic music. Originally dedicated to Napoleon Bonaparte, it is a revolutionary, large-scale composition characterized by its intense emotion, long duration, and dramatic use of dissonance

Related Link

Goethe on Napoleon
https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2010/04/goethe-on-napoleon.html

Monday, March 23, 2026

Mathematics Isn't Just for Math Nuts: An Introduction to James Duane Nickel

James Duane Nickel is an American educator, author, and mathematician who integrates Christian perspectives into mathematics education. Holding a BA in Mathematics, BTh, BMiss, and MA in Education, he serves as a Senior Fellow at the Center for Cultural Leadership. He is best known for his book Mathematics: Is God Silent? (revised edition), which argues for a biblical foundation in math, and the curriculum series The Dance of Number.

Why Study Mathematics? It Is the Language of Creation
https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2013/08/mathematics-is-god-silent.html

Let's Talk Algebra: Ten Minutes with James D Nickel

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2012/02/math-guy-talks-about-algebra-interview.html


Book Review – Mathematics: Is God Silent?

https://www.kuyperian.com/p/book-review-mathematics-is-god-silent


Interview with the Author of Mathematics: Is God Silent?

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2009/08/interview-with-author-of-mathematics-is.html


Interview with James D. Nickel on Mathematics: Is God Silent? (Part 2)

https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2009/08/interview-with-author-of-mathematics-is_27.html


Book Review: Mathematics – Is God Silent? (James Nickel)

https://relentlesspursuit.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/book-review-mathematics-is-god-silent-james-nickel/


Why James Nickel wrote "Mathematics: Is God Silent?"

https://biblicalchristianworldview.net/documents/whymathematicsisgodsilent.pdf


What others are saying about "Mathematics: Is God Silent?"

https://godandmath.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/review-of-mathematics-is-god-silent.pdf

"Every Christian teacher of mathematics should read this book."—Gene B. Chase


I would be remiss not to mention that James has been a long-time friend as well as a source of inspiration. At his Biblical Christian Worldview website you can see for yourself his dedication to the pursuit of God, love of mathematics and passion for educating future generations regarding the wonder and beauty of mathematics. 

Saturday, March 21, 2026

The Secret Sharer

I still remember the first time I read "The Secret Sharer" by Joseph Conrad. I had obtained this peach-colored paperback titled Great Short Works of Joseph Conrad. His story "The Lagoon" knocked my socks off when I first read it and made me hungry for more of Conrad's stories and novels. This volume included "Heart of Darkness," famously re-interpreted in Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now, as well as this one, "The Secret Sharer." I was determined to learn how to write short fiction (I didn't believe I had enough free time to write a novel while raising a family and holding down a full time job) so I selected classic authors and burrowed through as much of their work as I was able. Conrad was one of these.

I loved Conrad's stories for several reasons. First, because I was impressed by the fact that English was his third language. Second, because they were deep. He found ways to touch deep parts of our inner lives by making vivid the psychological complexity of his characters. Third, his descriptions were so alive and the writing beautiful. You could easily tell he had experienced the settings where his stories took place---a South Pacific island or Congo backwater or, in this case, a sailing vessel in the South Seas.

This story is told in first-person by a young, unnamed captain taking command of his first ship. Only later did I learn that "The Secret Sharer" is based partly on a real shipboard tragedy and partly on Conrad’s personal memories of himself commanding a vessel for the first time, which makes the story so real, even though that's not precisely what the story is about. By combining those two sources, Conrad created a psychological sea tale about leadership, responsibility, and something bigger. 

That "something bigger" is the nature of human nature. When I myself read "The Secret Sharer" I saw the story as a metaphor for our "two selves," the one that is hidden and the other that is known. This "house divided" cannot stand, thus the story is includes the question of how to bring resolution to this inner conflict.

As the story begins we learn that narrator is captain of a ship at port in the Gulf of Siam. Across the way there is another ship anchored called The Sephora. We quickly learn this our hero's first command as captain. He's quite young for such responsibilities, still in his twenties, and this story is essentially a rite of passage, his personal initiation into leadership.

The night before departure he instructs the crew to knock off early so they'll be rested for the voyage. The mates obey, but think it a curious thing for the captain to take the night watch in this manner. What happens next is even more curious. In the dark he goes to pull up the ladder but it seems stuck on something. When he looks, it startles him to see what appears to be a headless man holding on to the bottom rung of the ladder.

As he hung by the ladder, like a resting swimmer, the sea lightning played about his limbs at every stir; and he appeared in it ghastly, silvery, fishlike. He remained as mute as a fish, too. He made no motion to get out of the water, either. It was inconceivable that he should not attempt to come on board, and strangely troubling to suspect that perhaps he did not want to. And my first words were prompted by just that troubled incertitude.

He goes on to say...

I had somehow the impression that he was on the point of letting go the ladder to swim away beyond my ken—mysterious as he came. But, for the moment, this being appearing as if he had risen from the bottom of the sea.

In reading this I was immediately given the impression that this "bottom of the sea" was a metaphor for his subconscious self.

The man (his name is Leggatt) is invited to come aboard and the captain rushes off to get him clothes so that they are dressed alike and even look alike, Leggatt himself being in his twenties as well. As they talk, we learn that Leggatt shares the same education and background. The captain calls him his double, so there is no mistaking the meaning of this character. 

But we also, the captain and reader, learn that Leggatt is a fugitive. He killed a man while serving as first mate on the Sephora. The young captain listens to the man's account of the incident. The chief mate, refusing to follow orders to secure a sail, put the Sephora at risk and with it the safety of all aboard. In short, though Leggatt saved the ship he was locked up for the crime.  

Feeling the crime may have been justified, the narrator of this tale hides his double in his own quarters. They each share their personal stories and consider how things will unfold as a result of this unplanned, unlikely twist of fate.

So begins a tale fraught with tension, first because this is also a test of the captain's own ability to lead. And then there's the stress generated by having to conceal this secret from the crew. The story is a perfect setup to address themes of isolation, the duality of the self, courage, and the struggle to assert authority. 

As the story unfolds the screws tighten, but as in life, stress reveals who we are and what we're really made of. This is the heart of the story.  

* * *

Joseph Conrad had been working on the political novel Under Western Eyes, which dealt with life and politics in Russia, to write this shorter story which was originally called “The Secret-Sharer: An Episode from the Sea.” It was first published in two installments in Harper’s Monthly Magazine in August and September of 1910. A couple of years later, in October 1912, it appeared again as part of a small collection of Conrad’s sea stories titled ’Twixt Land and Sea: Tales.


Read the story here:

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/220/220-h/220-h.htm


Bonus Track: The Lagoon

https://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/Lago.shtml

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Remarkable Lessons from the Pixar Story: Creativity Inc.

How to Create and Manage a Creative Culture: Lessons from the Pixar Experience


When I first saw the silhouette on the cover of Creativity, Inc. I was stymied. It bore a resemblance to the familiar conductor who appears in Disney's Fantasia, but was not, yet it had a familiar look. It's like that puzzle with the vase and the face, or a number of similar optical illusions. Once you see it, you generally don't un-see. It was Buzz Lightyear, or rather a hybrid of these two iconic images, standing in as symbol for the phenomenal business hybrid of Disney and Pixar.

It was Brent Schlender's Becoming Steve Jobs that cued me in to the role Steve Jobs played in saving Pixar Animation Studios from the ash heap of stories that might have been, keeping the company on life support till all the pieces could be pulled together for the Hollywood supernova called Toy Story. Upon completion of this Jobs career and character development story, I felt impelled to read Ed Catmull's insider account of Pixar. The big achievement there, and the basic storyline in this book, was not Toy Story, or its various other superhits. Rather, Catmull's aim is to share a lifetime of insights about management in general, and managing creative people specifically.


How does a company create a creative culture where excellence flourishes, where ideas actually come to fruition and become earth-shaking events? Catmull shares everything, including all the lessons learned through their various failures, and the miracles that rose from those ashes.

The amazing thing is that despite the various mis-steps, Pixar never had a single film that bombed.

The book's subtitle tells the real story of what made Pixar such a superstar: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in The Way of True Inspiration. Unseen forces means forces can refer to forces that are invisible, like the ice below the surface that sunk the Titanic, or it can mean forces that are in plain sight, like Poe's Purloined Letter, but we do not see them. Catmull states that the management team had to be perpetually vigilant. What they were vigilant about was very different from most organizations.

At the end of the book Catmull does a summing up of his "Thoughts For Managing A Creative Culture." If you Google that title, you'll find that numerous writers have begun sharing these. Though Ed Catmull's stories make it such a rewarding read, his distilled thoughts at the end are well worth deeper reflection. Here's a small collection of notes from this five page reiteration of the book's themes.


--Give a good idea to a mediocre team, and they will screw it up. Give a mediocre idea to a great team, and they will either fix it or come up with something better. If you get the team right, chances are that they'll get the ideas right.

--It isn’t enough merely to be open to ideas from others. Engaging the collective brainpower of the people you work with is an active, ongoing process. As a manager, you must coax ideas out of your staff and constantly push them to contribute.

--There are many valid reasons why people aren’t candid with one another in a work environment. Your job is to search for those reasons and then address them.

--Likewise, if someone disagrees with you, there is a reason. Our first job is to understand the reasoning behind their conclusions. Further, if there is fear in an organization, there is a reason for it— our job is (a) to find what’s causing it, (b) to understand it, and (c) to try to root it out.

--There is nothing quite as effective, when it comes to shutting down alternative viewpoints, as being convinced you are right.

--In general, people are hesitant to say things that might rock the boat. Braintrust meetings, dailies, postmortems, and Notes Day are all efforts to reinforce the idea that it is okay to express yourself. All are mechanisms of self-assessment that seek to uncover what’s real.

--If there is more truth in the hallways than in meetings, you have a problem.

You can find more of these here or if you go ahead and purchase the book here.

* * * *
Healthy organisms and healthy organizations will grow naturally if given the right nourishment and environment. In the case of institutions, there have been plenty of books written about how they fail. Ed Catmull's insider perspective on Pixar's achievements has applications for all types of organizations. But it would be especially valuable for companies working in creative fields like ad agencies, theater, Hollywood, arts communities, new product development, communications and more.

More can be said, but we'll end with this: Read the book.

“Achieving enormous success while holding fast to the highest artistic standards is a nice trick—and Pixar, with its creative leadership and persistent commitment to innovation, has pulled it off. This book should be required reading for any manager.”
—Charles Duhigg, author of The Power of Habit

Originally published in 2017

Tuesday, June 28, 2022

Your Organizational Culture Matters More Than You Think

Over the course of my career I have been blessed with periods in which the work environment that I was in was uplifting and even motivational. Those seasons in which workers thrive and feel energized cab sometimes last years. I have also seen how workers can become demotivated and their joy be siphoned away. I've experienced it in both blue collar and white collar contexts and, sadly, when I hear people tell how much they love their work I inwardly think, "When you have that, cherish it. It doesn't always last."

Here's the beginning of a short guest blog I wrote for Audacity Human Resources. 

* * * * 

Your Organizational Culture Matters

The Gallup organization has been polling and writing about employee engagement for decades. One reason this is important is because employees who love their work and are fully invested are less likely to be seduced away by other opportunities. If that is not a compelling reason to think about your employees, then consider this. According to Gallup data, business units with engaged workers have 23% higher profit compared with business units with miserable workers.

At a time when businesses are scrambling for workers, you don’t want to be vulnerable to losing more members of your team, especially the key ones making a contribution.

READ THE REST OF THE STORY HERE:

Saturday, March 12, 2022

SimCity Should Be A Requirement For City Leadership

Photo by Chris Ensminger on Unsplash
When I got my first Mac in 1987, the Mac community was much like a fraternity. There was so much creativity going on, and all of it was being shared rather than commercialized. It was a new world and a community of disc swappers. 

Whether it was on my first Mac or second, one of the discs I received was an interesting "game" called Foxes and Rabbits. It wasn't a real game, but it did teach lessons about the relationship between predators and prey. When you set it in motion you could watch it play out based on the parameters you set. 

You would select a number for how many rabbits you wanted to start with, and another number for the foxes. Suppose you started with four rabbits and ten foxes. In short order the rabbits would be devoured and the game would be over as the foxes starved to death. But if you started with 76 rabbits and five foxes, you would initially see the rabbits multiply (like rabbits) and the foxes devouring them but multiplying at a slower pace. At a certain point when there were lots of foxes the rabbit population would decline and when it was in serious decline some of the foxes would starve, too.

The lesson here was that you could change the variables and visually observe the consequences.

Two years later the game SimCity (Simulated City) was created based on a similar concept. Originally developed by Will Wright, the game player (called the Mayor) would begin with a blank map that he or she would begin to develop. The goal of the game is to create a city that attracts citizens and businesses, then continues to grow.  

The player would soon learn about budgeting, as well as the various tradeoffs that need to be made to create a successful community. For the city to grow, citizens must be provided with utilities (electricity and water) and services like health care, education and parks, as well as relevant infrastructure and transportation.

This blog post was generated by a comment that a friend of mine made recently. He said, "It should be a requirement of everyone on city counsel and in city leadership to excel at SimCity 2000 and or the current version of this game, City Skyline. They need to excel at these games before they’re allowed to be on the council, in order to understand the inter-relatedness of all facets of the big picture involving power, people, and revenue... and most importantly the economics."

Having never played the game, I decided to search online for a few articles about lessons learned from playing. One of these was titled "Obsessively Playing SimCity 2000 Taught Me a Vital Lesson in Money Smarts." (1)

The author wrote, "There are all kinds of tweaks you can make to attract more citizens, from building roads to planning green space into your city to offering an attractive tax rate. But there's one factor that, unless addressed, will mean you attract zero new citizens to your growing town: utilities."

The author begins by noting the importance of understanding cities as systems. In this case he applies it to our personal finances by suggesting we view our whole life as a system.

Another article was titled "Learning with SimCity: Valuable Lessons Kids Can Learn Playing Mayor." (2) This article outlines numerous lessons gained by playing. The relationship of supply and demand, budgeting, urban planning, managing the environment, transport systems, and how utilities and services impact your city. To be successful in the game, children need to learn how to plan ahead. One outcome you don't want is urban decay. Another is bankruptcy.

One of the most powerful lessons kids can learn, this writer says, is how a society works as a whole system. Like the foxes and rabbits in my intro, changing one variable will have an impact in other areas. And, of course, there is always the law of unintended consequences waiting in the wings. 

Here are examples highlighted in the article:

If you provide decent living conditions with good employment and plenty of schools, crime rates drop, so you need fewer police stations. Good education systems also lead to richer Sims that work in high-tech industries, reducing pollution in your city.

If you create a good-quality health care system with plenty of hospitals and clinics then you improve the health of your citizens. This makes them work more effectively and brings more business to your city, which in turn increases tax revenue.

If you’re running short of cash, you can up your tax rates, but this may drive people away from your city. Alternatively you can choose to legalize gambling; however, this can push your city’s crime rate up.


* * * 

All these "ifs" sound great when you're starting with a clean slate. Most city leaders today find themselves inheriting a long history of well-meaning decisions with consequences that are only now coming to roost. Unlike SimCity and other games, you can't scrap it and start over. 

I have concerns about some of what's happening in our town. But that's a topic for another day.

Here are links to the stories cited above.


Popular Posts