The statement that especially jumped out for me--besides the shocking statistics she shared--was this one. When our inner thoughts are bottled up inside us, we live a diminished existence.
This is a recurring theme in many George Harrisons songs: love, meaning and connection. Within You Without You from Sgt. Pepper speaks of this in a sense, as does "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" on The White Album. Even "Blue Jay Way" from Magical Mystery Tour speaks with solemnity about being lost, alienated, in a fog.
As nearly every Beatles fan knows, the agreement John Lennon and Paul McCartney made with George was to limit the number of Harrison songs on each album. Many people, therefore, were surprised at how prolific George became after the breakup of the Fab Four.
I'm fairly certain that I was not the only one who kept buying albums by all four of the Beatles after they split. All Things Must Pass was George's offering in November 1970. I snapped it up and found it rewarding from the first time. The album was produced by Phil Spector, who also took the thousand-plus hours of studio mish mash and crafted Let It Be for the Beatles. (Paul didn't like what Sector produced, and remastered it in 2009. Beatles fans, however, were grateful that SOMEONE stepped up to the plate and finished this project. I still remember the first time I listed to it that fall.)
One of the great features of All Things Must Pass are the jam session recordings on sides five and six. Clapton and other musician friends really rock it out, knock it out of the park.
Isn't It a Pity is essentially two stanzas with the first one repeated again as the third. It initially sets the tone, gets amplified in verse two, then serves as an echo of itself as verse three. Here are the lyrics, carried forward by an swelling and ebbing undercurrent of lament.
Isn't it a pity
Isn't it a shame
How we break each other's hearts
And cause each other pain
How we take each other's love
Without thinking anymore
Forgetting to give back
Now isn't it a pity
Some things take so long
But how do I explain
When not too many people
Can see we're all the same
And because of all your tears
Your eyes can't hope to see
The beauty that surrounds us
Now, isn't it a pity
Isn't it a pity,
Now, isn't is a shame
How we break each other's hearts
And cause each other pain
How we take each other's love
Without thinking anymore
Forgetting to give back
Now, isn't it a pity
The pity here isn't just that we cause each other pain. It's that we cause our own pain, but don't see it. And as a result we also miss the beauty that surrounds us.
What is it that causes this cycle of suffering? Forgetting to give back, he sings.
Our own self-centeredness leaves us isolated. Perhaps its our personal feeling of self-importance that causes us to have a sense of entitlement, so we don't really appreciate what others do for us. We wanted (expected) more so that instead of gratitude we feel disappointment. As a result of our sense of self-importance, we generate our own isolation.
Here are three versions of the song. The first is George Harrison's original, remastered. The second is Eric Clapton. The last is Nina Simone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDrLTW_sesI
Eric Clapton (Live)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKu4U0YQBRo
Nina Simone
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLn3FT9BsRs
* * * *
Are we building walls or building bridges? Eleanor Rigby comes to mind. "Ah, look at all the lonely people."
And this one from Bob Dylan's "Fourth Time Around": "Everyone must give something back for something they get."
* * * *
The other problem Harrison pinpoints is the notion of we/they. "Not too many people can see we're all the same," he sings.
Our culture has become increasingly splintered along many fault lines. We see this not just in political spheres, but also gender, race, religion and more. We've lost sight of our essential and fundamental humanity, the "essence" that we share in common. A quest for meaning. A hunger for hope. A creative urge. Personality. Bone, flesh, blood. A need for affirmation.
We're really all the same. How have we lost sight of this?
2 comments:
Good commentary, except for this part: "As nearly every Beatles fan knows, the agreement John Lennon and Paul McCartney made with George was to limit the number of Harrison songs on each album." What's the source on that? Narrative I understood is that John and Paul were the lead songwriters from the get-go while George was still evolving, so it took awhile to wedge himself into the equation. George said, “The problem was that John and Paul had written songs for so long it was difficult … and they automatically thought that theirs should be priority.” But there was no conscious decision to limit him.
Going back even further, The Quarrymen was John's band, and to his credit he brought Paul in while knowing he (Paul) would be competition from him (John) being kingpin.
Yes, George evolved. I somehow thought I read long ago that George could do two original compositions per album... that is was discussed or something. I defer to others if someone has an insight here.
Thanks for reading and for adding your thoughts.
Post a Comment